FOLIO: mediaPRO

Magazine & eMedia Publishing Professional & Social Network

Has anyone else read up on the fact that submitting content via Google's new browser, Chrome, gives them a content license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit or post?

I'm not surprised and amazed all at the same time.

Tags: chrome, content, copyright, google, license

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Oh @%#$%!!!!

Sounds like a few lawsuits waiting to happen.

I have sometimes thought that b2b publishers biggest competitor isn't other trade publishers, but Google.

Reply to This

I don't think Google would be that stupid/open.

Because such a thing will place them shoulder to shoulder with Microsoft and from a good giant they will become an evil one.
Let's wait and actually see their actual Chrome license agreement...

Reply to This

Reply to This

That isn't very different from the Google AdWords contract for media sites. As a media site, Google will give you a percentage of the money they make running ads off of their site, but they won't tell you how big a percentage or even how much money they make off of your site.

sean

Reply to This

Or if they do tell you the percentage, it's off the "net" revenues and won't provide audited gross numbers.

Reply to This

Hi Prescott:

Yes, I actually did read that disclaimer before I downloaded Google Chrome and started to use it. I actually prefer it to the other browser. It is really easy to navigate and very simple to use, without all the distractions. You know that Google is scanning every book in the world, and asking for permission after the fact. We know that this is called copyright infringement, but I can see the bigger picture. I can see the flattening of the World, like Thomas Friedman speaks about. I can see my opportunities opening up far more than before Google existed. I guess if I want to publish something I don't want Google reproducing, adapting, modifying, translating, publishing, publicly performing, publicly displaying and distributing, then I will use a different web browser. I also use Google sites and am overall impressed with how far advanced they are compared to some of the other big timers like AOL/Time Warner, Yahoo, and Microsoft. Thanks for the post man, I appreciate the information.

Sincerely,

Rachel "Kenyata Truth" Armour
www.teachuswrite.com

Reply to This

To some, this is the "new way." Many new media publications use Creative Commons (and similar orgs) licensing, because they believe the point of the Internet is to share. Most, however, use some sort of limited license (e.g. must credit original author and any commercial use requires permission).

Reply to This

RSS

Sign in

E-mail

Password

Latest Activity

Bradon M Segal, Marquita Harris, Lonna Whiting and 2 more joined FOLIO: mediaPRO
56 minutes ago
1 hour ago
steve blacker and Kylie Gonzales are now friends
1 hour ago
Marquita Harris updated their profile
8 hours ago

Groups

Help Us Grow

Please Invite your co-workers & friends to join your network. They'll automatically be added to your Friends List. Click Now

Member Search

Search member profiles by keyword, company & more  

Ex: Chicago, "Penton Media"
Advanced Search

Badge

Loading…
Commercial Use Limitations: Use of any content features (blogs, forums, messaging, etc) for direct self-promotion, spamming, etc. will result in account termination. Profiles are for individuals only at this time, not companies. Profile headshots should not include company logos. Publishing/Media companies (non vendors) may create groups for their employees. Vendors see this post for more information.

© 2009   Created by FOLIO MediaPRO Team

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service