FOLIO: mediaPRO

Magazine & eMedia Publishing Professional & Social Network

Have you guys been following Scott Karp's blog "What Magazines [and Newspapers] Still Don't Understand About the Web"?

I work for a [print] magazine publisher who is transitioning into being an online magazine publisher. It's very exciting. Scott brings up some very interesting points and I love the comments that some have been leaving—on both sides of the "argument".

I, myself, am a heavy internet user, so I am of the belief that premium content should be available at no additional cost to internet users. But then how do the publishers make their money? Advertising alone? If print subscriptions are phasing out, is it up to advertising dollars alone to bare the burden.

Obviously, if the print magazines went away, the overhead (mainly print costs) would be far less and subsequently we wouldn't have to rely on advertising as much. But I don't see that as the way this industry is going. Not yet, at least. So in the interim... is it okay to give away premium content for free on the internet and just "hope" that advertising brings in enough bucks to cover the nut?

Tags: e-zine, print, publishing

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi, I am sherry and I have quite a bit to say about advertising. I am a new freelance writer; I use the internet very often and I think advertising is quite useful in promoting my small freelance business. I browse websites, Ezines, blogs. For those who think of writing as a professional activity I am near the end of my novel and is very excited about it. This group can bring a lot of interesting points. I think content is available without much cost. Well if it could be free, I think all of us whether you are a writer, editor, publisher could benefit from advertising.

Reply to This

Hi Cara,

Naturally, you're going to read my signature and you may assume that I have a bias in this discussion. I've read SO many articles on this topic, I hope that I have a non-biased background on this discussion.

A lot of publishers are actually now pulling back on this practice, and requiring pay-for-online-content (via the downfall of the newspaper industry). From a consumer-behavior perspective, consumers tie "price" to "value" (e.g. a pair of Nike shoes for $125) , so if something is "free" then therefore it is "valueless".

I believe that digital magazines should be used as a new revenue-channel, and not as a replacement to print, but as a supplement. Consumers tie a higher "user-experience" with print. In fact, did you know that the average number of pages read on a digital magazine is only 12. The experience with print and digital is just so different, that I can't imagine that one should replace the other. They should work in tandem.

Just my two cents,

Adam Trull, Quad/Graphics

Reply to This

RSS

Sign in

E-mail

Password

Latest Activity

Nanci Theoret updated their profile
4 minutes ago
23 minutes ago
2 hours ago
2 members updated their profile photos
2 hours ago

Groups

Help Us Grow

Please Invite your co-workers & friends to join your network. They'll automatically be added to your Friends List. Click Now

Member Search

Search member profiles by keyword, company & more  

Ex: Chicago, "Penton Media"
Advanced Search

Badge

Loading…
Commercial Use Limitations: Use of any content features (blogs, forums, messaging, etc) for direct self-promotion, spamming, etc. will result in account termination. Profiles are for individuals only at this time, not companies. Profile headshots should not include company logos. Publishing/Media companies (non vendors) may create groups for their employees. Vendors see this post for more information.

© 2009   Created by FOLIO MediaPRO Team

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service