Here's a tough topic that I hope might spark some conversation.
Often we are called upon as
prepress operators to make grayscale images produce with more of a snap in a 4 color publication. Many times the black-only halftones just look washed-out. So to achieve more impact we print them in 4 color process.
Operators are required to print grayscale images in 4/c process making sure that the image has an entirely neutral value. To give an example of this; take a RGB image/scan; convert this to grayscale ;and finally convert to CMYK. This gives you a neutral gray in all tonal areas of the image. Of course this is only an example and there are much, much better ways to produce the 4/c gray image which we can talk about in a separate discussion, but the objective here is still the same.
Upon further examination the profile GCR and gray ramp will show similar to the figure
(attached here) where the ramp up of black takes over around the 50% range. While this type of curve may be useful for reducing black ink consumption, it's unlikely to produce a controllable 4/c grayscale image. The range from 0-30% can shift dramatically with only the slightest shift in ink density. A more appropriate curve for a 4/c gray image would make use of black ink early in the curve to help keep the possibility of color shift to a minimum.

When I think back 8-10 years ago we didn't really experience much of this problem, so I went back to photoshop v4 and compared the conversions. Resent changes in color settings and profiling have made significant impact in the ability to control color management but made the conversion of 4 color grayscale images more problematic in printing.
I would be delighted to know if anyone has been successful in created any custom profiles to handle these conversions. I can certainly create my own profile with the correct color space and GCR to do this, but thought I'd post it here to see if anyone has any feedback first.
Tags: cmyk, color, conversion, gcr, grayscale, image, photo, photoshop, prepress, print
Share
- Attachments:
-
-
▶ Reply to This